Asides

Natasha (updated from 3/17)

By March 18, 2009No Comments

Comfort_4

From The Comfort Of Strangers, Paul Schrader, 1990

Natasha Richardson is, and always has been, an act­ress of uncom­mon beauty, intel­li­gence and grace. I have ever loved her work, and I must admit that, ever since see­ing her once in per­son, lunch­ing at the late, great Lola some­time in the lat­ter part of the 1980s—where she looked sev­er­al times more gor­geous and lumin­ous than she does in even her most glam­our­ous screen roles, and impressed this six-foot-plus lad with her height as well—I’ve nur­tured a star­struck crush on her of the sort that I’m loath to admit, not being much of a star­struck sort in gen­er­al. All of which is my round­about and awk­ward way of say­ing I’m genu­inely, and pos­sibly inap­pro­pri­ately, torn up by her cur­rent plight, and that I’m pray­ing for her, and for all of her fam­ily, very ardently indeed. 

UPDATE: I just (late Wednesday) learned the awful news of her death. One may con­nect what dots one may—I think of Natasha’s moth­er, Vanessa Redgrave, bring­ing to life Joan DIdion’s grief so very recently—but the bot­tom line is there is no great­er tragedy than a par­ent hav­ing to put to rest a child. For whatever it’s worth, I would like to con­vey my most sin­cere con­dol­ences to all of Natasha Richardson’s family. 

No Comments

  • Joe Bowman says:

    I’m very con­cerned about the strange­ness of the reports sur­round­ing her injury. I feel the same way, Glenn.

  • markj says:

    Such an awful piece of news. Natasha always comes across as a genu­inely nice per­son. Let’s hope today brings some good news.

  • bill says:

    I was fol­low­ing this story all day yes­ter­day, and, while I have no idea how severe her con­di­tion actu­ally is, there are some journ­al­ists who need to lose their jobs over their report­ing. “Time Out New York” claimed, at one point yes­ter­day, that she’d died. They retrac­ted that in favor of report­ing that she was brain dead. From what I’ve been read­ing, that’s not true either. She’s suf­fer­ing from brain swell­ing, which could be bad, or could be treated with little to no last­ing dam­age to her. I’m obvi­ously ardently hop­ing for the lat­ter pos­sib­il­ity, but Adam Feldman for “TONY” needs to have his ass handed to him for his coverage.

  • Campaspe says:

    I agree with Bill. I’ve been work­ing in the big bad media for ages, but any­one can see that TONY did­n’t fol­low stand­ard pro­ced­ure, which is to get con­firm­a­tion from either the imme­di­ate fam­ily or the hos­pit­al. It’s a ques­tion not only of simple human decency, but of how fuck­ing stu­pid and ghoul­ish you will look if you are wrong. The wire ser­vices and places like CNN and Fox appar­ently did wait, but in this Internet age it is all about get­ting the hits. So you get creeps like Perez and TMZ jump­ing all over it, then blam­ing TONY when the story was­n’t right. If Perez wants to claim he’s a journ­al­ist he’s gotta act like one–you look at TONY’s thin sourcing (“fam­ily friends”) and check it your­self. You don’t need a Columbia degree to fig­ure that out.
    Anyway, rant over, it’s just awful to think of how the cov­er­age much have deepened the pain for the people who know her. She and Neeson have been a fix­ture on the NY char­ity cir­cuit for years and have done a lot of good for the city’s cul­tur­al insti­tu­tions. I am really, really hop­ing she pulls through.

  • colinr says:

    I agree on Nastasha Richardson and am hop­ing for the best.
    I’ve been a bit annoyed that the reports here in the UK are only focus­ing on her roles in The Parent Trap and Maid In Manhattan (with a bit of foot­age of her char­ac­ter meet­ing Liam Neeson’s in Nell for added poignancy) instead of acknow­ledging her work in Gothic, The Company of Strangers (as noted above), Patty Hearst and so on.
    I hold her in par­tic­u­larly high regard for her role in The Handmaid’s Tale, which moved me so much it inspired me to search out Margaret Atwood’s novel…but I still ima­gined Richardson in the title role while reading!
    And Asylum which seems to have been some­what under­rated amongst her recent work.

  • bill says:

    Asylum” was an odd one. I remem­ber that Ebert slammed it as being ridicu­lously melo­dra­mat­ic, and ima­gined that the source nov­el, by Patrick McGrath, must be dif­fer­ent. Well, I’ve read that book, and I can tell you that the film hewed to it pretty closely, and I don’t remem­ber think­ing the film ramped up tone. And, to me, the level of Gothic melo­drama in both the nov­el and film seemed well with­in the bounds of reas­on. That said, I did­n’t love the movie – it seemed to want to just be the nov­el, on screen. I did think Richardson was very good, though.

  • justine says:

    Add me to those say­ing a novena for Natasha Richardson, a truly lumin­ous actress.
    And add me to the list of admirers of “Asylum” – a fairly per­fect cap­tur­ing of Patrick McGrath’s nov­el, with an intense, dar­ing lead per­form­ance by Richardson.

  • Ryan Kelly says:

    What awful, awful news. My con­dol­ences to Mr. Neeson and Vanessa Redgrave, as no one deserves this kind of pain in their life.

  • bill says:

    When I heard this news, I felt sick inside. My con­dol­ences to her fam­ily, as well.

  • Max says:

    Tragic enough had she fell and was severely injured imme­di­ately. But the fact that she was up walk­ing and laugh­ing, then com­plained of head­aches, and now this… so awful. To lose a wife of 15 years so sud­denly, and for her moth­er such a young daugh­ter, I can­not imagine.

  • Andrew Wyatt says:

    It seems she’s left us. Shit.
    Fond memor­ies of her look­ing very sexy in a dis­tinctly Irish pas­tor­al way oppos­ite Mia Farrow and Joan Plowright in Widow’s Peak.