Housekeeping

Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah

By July 10, 2009No Comments

Waitresses Auteurs

Far left: once puked out the door of Steven Kramer’s par­ents’ sta­tion wagon

What do The Waitresses, the delight­ful ’80s band whose bizarre his­tory would have made a dynam­ite epis­ode of Behind the Music, have to do with what went on in movies this week? I ima­gine that you, my superbly well-informed read­er­ship, already know, but what the hell, I need some kind of teas­er for the latest install­ment of my new­ish week-that-was-ish column at The Auteurs’, and the darn song has been un-get-outta-ble of my head since I heard it again for the first time in many years in that stu­pid trail­er. If that’s not enough of an entice­ment, said column also includes my Armond White-ism of the week—what’s yours? In any case, here you go

No Comments

  • bill says:

    I would respond to the “cul­tur­al pro­cliv­it­ies of the Right” thing, but A) I’m get­ting bored doing that, frankly; and b) in all hon­esty, the Cultural Proclivities of the Right as rep­res­en­ted on the inter­net do not make me ter­ribly proud.
    So any­way. My real ques­tion: did you pitch this column idea to the Auteurs, or did they come to you about it? Because you really seem to enjoy this side job. And I enjoy read­ing it very much.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    It’s funny; when I con­cocted the phrase “Weird News of the Cultural Proclivities,” etc., the stress in my head was more on “Weird News” than on, well, you know. But that Derbyshire screed IS pretty, um, unusu­al, you have to admit.
    The column was cooked up by myself and Auteurs’ edit­or Dan Kasman after a lot of agon­iz­ing over how to fur­ther solid­i­fy my pres­ence over there. At first I was wor­ried about bit­ing David Hudson’s style, but I soon real­ized that I flat­ter myself to even ima­gine that I could ever do so, and that the real point of the column was for me to make even more of a jerk of myself than I do here, which gives the whole enter­prise a feel that (I hope) is kind of intriguingly counter to the dig­nity dis­played by the remainder of the Auteurs’ site.
    Glad you’re lik­ing it. Tell your friends!

  • JF says:

    Bruno might be cinema. Maybe. It’s prob­ably worth see­ing, at any rate, and the many prob­lems with it (as a movie, as a satire) seem to be worth mulling over after­ward. It’s cer­tainly of more interest than The Hangover, which had only Zach Galifianakis and his beard to recom­mend it.