Great ArtIconsImages

The divine Kim

By August 23, 2010No Comments

Some selec­ted images from Jeanne Eagels (George Sidney, 1957):

Jeanne #1 

Jeanne 2 

Jeanne #3 

Yeah, I finally bit the bul­let last night and watched the damn thing (the new DVD, that is, from the new Kim Novak col­lec­tion from Sony) in all its glory on my 13-inch backup TV. Quite a whacked-out pic­ture, surely; cer­tain por­tions of it had me spin­ning my wheels, spec­u­lat­ing as to wheth­er Sidney was in fact some diabol­ic­al hybrid of Douglas Sirk and Ed Wood. A sub­ject for fur­ther research to be sure, although I don’t know if I have the intest­in­al forti­tude to go back to those late ’30s “Our Gang” shorts, in which all the kids have by now reached middle age, or some­thing. Anyway. Eagels is cited by the Surrealist crit­ic and film­maker Ado Kyrou as one of those “sub­lime melo­dra­mas in which the most unbridled sense of the baroque remains sense­less for those unable to read between the images.” Also on his lists are a couple of Sirks (Written on the Wind and Imitation of Life), which means maybe I’m on to some­thing; the “admir­able” Minnelli film which gives this blog its name; and, um, Jack Webb’s Pete Kelly’s Blues. Watching this again also reminded me of how, way back in the day, when I’d get into a polit­ic­al argu­ment with my friend and then col­league Ed Hulse (whose book on Lone Pine in the movies you should def­in­itely own), and he would have my back to the wall on some issue or oth­er, the only thing I would have left would be to exclaim, “I don’t need you! I don’t need any­body! I’m Jeanne Eagels!” Which would crack him up to the extent that he would at least stop attack­ing me, sob.

Anyhow, as you may have noticed, I’m kind of queer for Novak. No, wait, that came out wrong. How about, I’ve ever been of the con­sidered opin­ion that she can do no wrong. (My mom tells me that even as a very small child I “liked” her, but I’ve nev­er asked for Mater to give me any more spe­cif­ic example of how said like was mani­fes­ted.) I feel about her pretty much as that MacMahonist nut felt about Charlton Heston, that her mere pres­ence in any film was enough to cre­ate beauty. And there, above, she is. How can one dis­agree, I won­der. Some things are just, you know, cine­mat­ic­ally sound. Novak was always one of them.

UPDATE: “This photo needs a prop­er ‘lol’ cap­tion,” notes com­menter Dizzy, but his link does­n’t work. No mat­ter, I found it, and decided that in this case sim­pler is better.

LOL Kim

No Comments

  • My moth­er always claimed that my fath­er “liked” Sheree North, and not under­stand­ing exactly what that meant either, I asked him about it a few years ago. “Sheree who?” he replied.
    Clearly a lot of people can dis­agree about La Kim, but they’re wrong. Wrong, I say. Some of them even seem to prefer Doris Day. I don’t know how we’re all man­aged to live in the same world togeth­er for this long.

  • Actually the first Kim Novak film I ever saw was *not* VERTIGO. Rather it was THE MIRROR CRACK’D, an Agatha Christie adapt­a­tion from the early 80s, which I watched because I was a Christie fan (I rarely went to movies as a boy or teenager).
    It had Angela Lansbury as Miss Marple, solv­ing a murder among a Hollywood troupe film­ing on loc­a­tion in St. Mary Meade. The troupe included Elizabeth Taylor as the star, Novak as the jealous-rival act­ress, Rock Hudson as Taylor’s husband-director and Tony Curtis as her exlover-producer (oth­er than Liz, I had barely a clue about these people’s pre­vi­ous work). The scenes with Novak are camp delights of deli­ri­ously over-the-top act­ing. There’s actu­ally a scene set in a pro­du­cer­’s office and we see Kim sit­ting on the edge of the table, look­ing it her hand­held mir­ror, adjust­ing her hair and admir­ing her makeup. And I also loved Novak and Taylor doing the epi­gram­mat­ic ver­sion of chocolate-sauce cat-fights – Kim to Liz when they take pub­li­city pho­tos: “chin up, darling. Both of them.” Liz to Kim: “that dress on you reminds me of a wed­ding cake. From which every­body’s already had a piece.” (I’m chuck­ling myself to Proustian tears even typ­ing this stuff in, though I haven’t seen the film in … gawd … 15–20 years.) Needles to say, Novak is way bet­ter than Taylor in the bitchy vamp contest.
    Glenn … it will test your lim­its for All Things Kim.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    You for­get, Mr. Morton, that you are speak­ing to a man who ALSO (with His Lovely Wife) wor­ships at the Altar Of Lansbury, and who in fact last night watched two, count ’em two, epis­odes of “Murder She Wrote,” from Season 11, no less. So I daresay I’m likely to gobble up “The Mirror Crack’d” when I next encounter it. In fact, I may just have to buy the damn thing now…

  • Just to whet your appet­ite some more, in THE MIRROR CRACK’D Lansbury plays Miss Marple in a much more common-sensical, less-dotty mode than, say, Margaret Rutherford did in that early-60s string of Marple films. If it wer­en’t for the ana­chron­ism (THE MIRROR CRACK’D is from 1980), you could almost cri­ti­cize Lansbury for play­ing Miss Marple too much like Jessica Fletcher. This was clearly the film that won Lansbury her defin­ing TV role.
    But if you and The Lovely Wife want Lansbury in a Christie set­ting, I’d recom­mend over THE MIRROR CRACK’D (yes, I know … Kim) that you see if you haven’t already the Ustinov-as-Poirot ver­sion of DEATH ON THE NILE. Lansbury plays one of the pas­sen­gers, an alco­hol­ic romance writer. She is one of the two great sources of com­edy in the film (along with Bette Davis and Maggie Smith as a grande dame and her bitter-spinster companion).

  • Count me as a Novak fan, too. Didn’t come to it early, I’m afraid, but I *did* see “Lylah Clare” (which I adore) in its first run at Grauman’s Chinese – which must count for some­thing. I also remem­ber R. Crumb’s cari­ca­ture of Novak.
    I’ve yet to see the entirety of “Eagels,” but I like what have seen. Notably that quasi-hallucinatory appear­ance of Virginia Grey when Novak is onstage. I also remem­ber, when I saw the last half if it on tele­vi­sion, men­tally com­par­ing the Novak and Agnes Moorehead per­form­ances, and think­ing “Given a choice between someone ‘act­ing’ like crazy [i.e. Moorhead] and someone who simply exists for the cam­era [i.e. Novak], the lat­ter is going to win every time.

  • hamletta says:

    My mom loved “Bell, Book, and Candle,” and I saw it on TV when I was about 7 and it blew my little mind. She named our cat Pyewacket, too.

  • Stephanie says:

    It must be a guy thing. The only time Novak has ever had that effect on me is “Picnic.” She does her usu­al sleep­walk­er routine for most of the movie and then she starts to dance with Holden and she is magic. It goes away again almost as soon as the music stops, but still, for a brief shin­ing moment, etc.

  • Chris O. says:

    Probably too late get­ting this info out (unless folks read take note of “Recent Comments” on the right), but TCM just ran the trail­er to JEANNE EAGELS (wacky – “I don’t want to know you, Jeanne, I want to MARRY you”) as they going to air it this Wednesday, Sept. 1, I believe, at 10pm (EST).