Movies

The current cinema, liking things edition

By June 30, 2011No Comments

03

I don’t know what the hell’s wrong with me lately,” I con­fided to my col­league Andrew O’Hehir the oth­er night as we trudged from a screen­ing of Larry Crowne to a screen­ing of Transformers: Dark of the Moon. (I drop the name in the interest of authen­ti­city, and per­haps in foment­ing the belief that yes, it IS all a media con­spir­acy.) “Maybe I’m get­ting beaten down by sum­mer movies, but I’m start­ing to LIKE stuff. As in, you know, I actu­ally liked THAT. Or maybe it’s that I liked THEM. I dunno.”

But I still insist that there is pleas­ure to be had from the film that could also be titled Tom Hanks’ Character’s Adventures In A Post-Racial American Unemployment Wonderland, or some­thing, as you will glean from my review for MSN Movies. A lot of that has to do with the two leads (the oth­er is my fel­low Soderbergh alum Julia Roberts), who in less than 48 hours or so will be chas­tised by the likes of the usu­al sus­pects for an inab­il­ity to put “butts” in “seats.” Whatever, I still like ’em, so sue me. One top­ic of interest I was­n’t able to fully get into is Gugu Mbatha Raw’s dis­arm­ing and unusu­al vari­ant on the Manic Pixie Dream Girl role and how the com­pletely inap­pro­pri­ate romantic “poten­tial” between her char­ac­ter and the title char­ac­ter is thwarted with dis­patch and made into a com­ic leit­mot­if. Discuss, if you’d like.

No Comments

  • Phil Freeman says:

    Even Tom Hanks (screen­writer, dir­ect­or, star) real­izes he does­n’t deserve someone as blind­ingly hot as Gugu Mbatha Raw.
    I saw the trail­er for this; it looked ter­rible. Gonna pass.

  • Bilge says:

    Dear god how I hated LARRY CROWNE. Tonally all over the place – a sup­posedly ser­i­ous scene of Larry get­ting fired “under­cut” by some weirdly broad Rob Riggle shtick that turns it into a lame SNL sketch, classroom scenes that veer drunk­enly between earn­est and faux-goofy – with a romance that nev­er starts but then some­how becomes the film’s entire rais­on d’être. Oh, and every poten­tial dra­mat­ic obstacle either imme­di­ately resolved or entirely for­got­ten. I loved it when Hanks said some­thing at the end about how Julia’s class changed his life, and the woman sit­ting next to me (a total stranger) turned to me and said, “Wait, what did she actu­ally DO?”
    I love Hanks as an act­or, but wow is this movie a per­fect storm of incom­pet­ence – his flac­cid dir­ec­tion coupled with Vardalos’s unspeak­able plot­ting and dia­logue, and punc­tu­ated with ran­dom bits of trans­par­ent movie insight into The Way We Live Now. Wow. I did­n’t like THAT THING YOU DO either, but that’s prac­tic­ally THE NIGHT OF THE HUNTER com­pared to this.
    I did like George Takei, though, if only because his beyond-strange per­form­ance worked with the film’s wild, uncon­trolled swerves in tone.
    And I should add, Glenn, that I was in a GREAT mood when I sat down to con­sume this par­tic­u­lar shit sand­wich. No joke.

  • Partisan says:

    So Hanks’ romantic interest in LARRY CROWNE is Julia Roberts, which just reminds me that appar­ently Hollywood thinks that none of Hanks’ romantic interests from SPLASH to CASTAWAY is worthy of appear­ing in films today.

  • jbryant says:

    True, Partisan. In fact, as far as I know, Wilson the vol­ley ball has yet to make a second film.

  • Kevyn Knox says:

    Ya know, I often find both Hanks and Roberts quite insuf­fer­able (and don’t get me star­ted on the lack of fresh writ­ing from that Big Fat Stoopid Greek Wedding harpie!) and yes, the film does gladhand its audi­ence much too much, but ya know what – I kinda liked the damned thing. There, go ahead and bash. Bring it on people.