Sonny Bunch of The Washington Times, who interviewed me a while back on the subject of film grain and its place in video representations of cinema, has been blogging from the SIlverdocs documentary film festival. Where he met up with one of the giants of American documentaries, and put the grain question to him. The answer Bunch got might surprise you, and it just goes to show you can never really tell with these things. Find out here.
ArgumentationDVDSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny
Against the grain
Subscribe to Funerals & Snakes
“Dan Slevin is consistently, convincingly, unpretentiously, perceptively, thoughtfully and articulately the best film reviewer across all media.” – RNZ National listener feedback.
Tools of the Trade
F&S Recommends
About F&S
You May Also Like
ImagesSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny
Image of the day, 6/26/10
Image of the day, 6/26/10
DJ Kim (Novak, that is) gets set to spin some platters on the hi-fi in…
Glenn KennyJune 26, 2010
ArgumentationSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny
A point, conceded, up to a point (Updated)
A point, conceded, up to a point (Updated)
In the extremely contentious comments thread to the post "The Cinema of Contingency: Notes on…
Glenn KennyFebruary 6, 2009
HousekeepingSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny
Hope you like our new direction…
Hope you like our new direction…
The latest installment of my win-friends-and-influence-people project at The Auteurs', the Topics/Questions/Exercises of the week,…
Glenn KennyAugust 7, 2009
I’m not surprised by Maysles’ response. It’s what I would expect from a documentarian, accustomed to working in the low-budget arena, seeking to enhance the “quality” and approximation to reality any way he can.
Narrative filmmakers who usually work in mainstream, big-budget productions, on the other hand, would definitely be more conscious about pursuing the deliberate aesthetic associated with grain.