HousekeepingSome Came Running by Glenn Kenny

And then my mind split open...

By March 5, 2010January 12th, 202619 Comments

Mind

Do you know this man? If so, why? Whether you do or not, go on and check out The Auteurs’ for some Topics that’ll have an equally gal­van­ic effect on you. Maybe. Probably not. But, you know…

19 Comments

  • Hey, I think Topics are your best enter­tain­ment value – always look for­ward to them.
    Although, Glenn, you should toggle back there and fix “Point Blank” to “Point Break” – the kind of typo/synaptic cockup we all do some­times, but people tend to over­re­act to.
    Although, I don’t know. I kind of LIKE the idea of Lee Marvin as a bank-robbing surfer…

  • The Siren says:

    Pssst…I believe you mean Bigelow’s Point Break, not Point Blank.
    I loved Olivier’s speech because I always assumed it was inten­tion­al BS. It’s too bril­liant an exer­cise in say­ing noth­ing at great length to be any­thing oth­er than piss-taking on an epic scale.

  • The Siren says:

    Stephen, I was also going to say that Bigelow would have remade Point Blank a lot bet­ter than Brian Helgeland did.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    SIren, John Boorman likes to tell the story of how he and Lee Marvin threw the ori­gin­al script of “Point Blank” out of a hotel win­dow because it was such garbage…and then joke that said script must have landed on Brian Helgeland’s head, because that’s what “Payback” turned out to be…

  • Dan Coyle says:

    What… the… hell?

  • lazarus says:

    Nothing will ever top Chaplin’s hon­or­ary Oscar. It’s not that the stand­ing ova­tion lasts for so long, but that all these people are yelling out stuff like “Bravo!” as well. I’ve nev­er seen such rous­ing adu­la­tion at any event like this. And his speech, unlike Olivier’s, seems unscrip­ted and appro­pri­ately humble from a man who more than any­one had a right to proudly bask in the glory.
    I could watch it ten times in a row and get choked up with each viewing.
    Second would be Stanwyck’s hon­or­ary award the year after William Holden gave her major props dur­ing a co-presentation at the cere­mony, and Holden had died since.
    Third, oddly enough, would prob­ably be when Muhummad Ali was brought up on stage after When We Were Kings won Best Documentary.

  • Roger Mexico says:

    Mark E. Smith has much to say to Mr. White:
    His heart organ was where it should be
    His brain was in his arse
    His hand was well out of his pocket
    His psyche’s in the hearth
    ——————————–
    Became a recluse
    And bought a computer
    Set it up in the home
    Elusive big one
    On the screen
    Saw the Holy Ghost, I swear
    On the screen
    Where’s the cursor?
    Where’s the eraser?
    Where’s the cursor?
    Where’s the eraser?
    ———————————–
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umKEj_fFNBw

  • The Siren says:

    Lazarus, indeed those were all intensely mov­ing, Chaplin because he had been houn­ded out of a coun­try and industry he once loved, and Stanwyck all the more so because Holden’s death had been so tra­gic. Others I can still remem­ber were Satyajit Ray, clutch­ing his award on his death bed, and the incred­ible mont­age of his films; Miep Gies going up to the daïs with the doc­u­ment­ary dir­ect­or and being too over­come to speak; and Stanley Donen’s little soft-shoe.

  • Agree with all of those, Siren.
    And then there were the com­plic­ated awards – like the unspoken annoy­ance that Orson Welles seemed to evid­ence, as he was giv­en a “career achieve­ment” prize for a career he obvi­ously felt was still in full roar.
    And if that award and Paul Newman’s were clearly hon­ors giv­en too early, there’s the prob­lem with awards giv­en too late – as in, for example, the Oscar to the very frail Mary Pickford…

  • lazarus says:

    You’re right about the “too late” thing, and in addi­tion to the Pickford award (which has a rather creepy vibe, like a com­bin­a­tion of Kane’s Xanadu and Grey Gardens), it’s a shame that an unre­cog­niz­able Myrna Loy had to accept hers via satel­lite (and with a one-line speech), or that Jean Renoir was­n’t there to see Ingrid Bergman’s touch­ing trib­ute in person.

  • joel_gordon says:

    I also think that Fiedler was quot­ing from Melville’s review of Hawthorne’s Mosses from the Old Manse, not from Moby-Dick. Strike two on that quote?

  • The Siren says:

    Given that so many of us have vivid memor­ies of hon­or­ary awards, it makes the Academy’s decision to move those to a sep­ar­ate din­ner all the more bone-headed, I have to say. I sup­pose it’s that old bug­a­boo “rel­ev­ance” again. Christ I hate rel­ev­ance. But you knew that…

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    Joel: Or was it a let­ter to Hawthorne? In which case I’d call it a foul. White, on the oth­er hand, whiffed com­pletely. But it’s good to be fallible.

  • lazarus says:

    I’ve been harp­ing on this all over town, but it incenses me that those hon­or­ary awards were taken off-the-air only to make room for things like a spe­cial trib­ute to John Hughes, who would­n’t even be worthy of an hon­or­ary award him­self had he lived long enough.
    (insert pic of Macaulay Culkin from Home Alone poster)

  • joel_gordon says:

    I guess I just whiffed on strike three. The line before–“There is a grand truth about Nathaniel Hawthorne”–always makes me think it’s in the “Hawthorne and His Mosses” review, but I guess it’s in a let­ter to NH, refer­ring to Hawthorne in the third per­son. I’ve just dis­honored my half-finished American Lit dis­ser­ta­tion. Anyway, White is cor­rect about the lame­ness of the Oscars, and I think he’s also cor­rect that Hurt Locker is unex­cep­tion­al in the con­text of Bigelow’s awe­some career. Most of the essay, though, was just the usu­al “too many people care about some­thing, so I’m going to write a long essay to show you how much I don’t care about some­thing” routine. I’ve heard worse. Today I listened to Ben Lyons on NPR talk­ing about the Oscars. That was much worse.

  • Glenn Kenny says:

    @ Joel: I bet it was.
    Apropos of little else, I had the great priv­ilege of see­ing Fiedler speak, and then hav­ing a brief con­ver­sa­tion with him, at my old school back in 1980. What a delight­ful fel­low. We talked about Roger Sale’s asser­tion that John Hawkes had a “con­tempt­ible ima­gin­a­tion,” which Fiedler of course con­sidered ridicu­lous on many levels. Oh, for fun…

  • markj says:

    @TheSiren: I com­pletely agree, the hon­or­ary awards were one of the high­lights of the show for me. I’ll miss them this year.

  • Craig says:

    It’s also “Kathryn,” not “Katherine” Bigelow.

  • JP says:

    The firm­a­ment! The firmament!

Leave a Reply