Asides

The current cinema

By October 29, 2010No Comments

Monsters pic

That the low-budget sci-fi thrill­er refuses to die remains, I think, a heart­en­ing state of affairs; that the low-budget sci-fi thrill­er insists on tout­ing its ostens­ible high-mindedness, on the oth­er hand, is some­thing of a prob­lem. My review of Gareth Edwards’ Monsters, for MSN Movies, elab­or­ates. 

No Comments

  • Philmiv says:

    So do the octop­oid mon­sters actu­ally come back and per­form “Give Peace a Chance”? Cuz that I’d watch, preachy or no.
    Too bad. I had high hopes for this.

  • Jason M. says:

    Hell, they don’t even have to per­form “Give Peace a Chance.” I’d plunk myself down in a theat­er for the mon­sters singing “It’s a Small World After All.”
    So, am I also cor­rect in assum­ing that, in fact, the tit­u­lar mon­sters may be, you know, refer­ring to us?

  • Given the hat-tip to “Apocalypse Now” at the begin­ning, I was rather hop­ing for a Dennis Hopper char­ac­ter to show up near the last third of the film, ranting.
    “Aliens, man. You can­’t just build a WALL, man. Cause you’re only walling YOURSELF in, man.” Or some­thing to that effect.
    Just in case, you know, there were a few mouth-breathers who needed the movie’s obvi­ous point explained to them even more obviously.
    Like you, Glenn, I liked the giant ambu­lat­ory octopi. I even did­n’t mind the sort of deja-viewed “Salvador” feel to the whole thing. (Would “Salvador” have been even bet­ter if James Woods had been attacked by a giant extra­ter­restri­al? Discuss.)
    But in the end, this is one of those movies that’s more inter­est­ing for how little it cost, rather than how much it says (which is far less than it thinks)…

  • Graig says:

    Agreed. I walked out of the film kind of impressed by the cam­er­a­work and the sense of real-world ver­simil­it­ude, as well as, of course, the effects – that final octopi coup­ling at the gas sta­tion is really cool, and in a bet­ter movie would have knocked me out flat – but the storytelling is flat and all the per­form­ances are pretty wan. I mean, Scoot McNairy, nice guy though I’m sure he is, does­n’t have much in the way of a James Woods cha­risma. Which this film des­per­ately needs.

  • John says:

    I’m not so sure the budget and the film’s sup­posed self-awareness of high-mindedness are the real prob­lems. The real prob­lem is prob­ably, you know, ‘it’s not that great’. Have no fear, though! On the Silver Globe is com­ing out on DVD!

  • The tag-line when “Monsters” screened here at the loc­al inter­na­tion­al film fest here two months back was some­thing to the effect of ‘hor­ror meets Cassavettes’. Instead of pulling me in, I recoiled with a “what the…?” frown.
    I agree with your review, Glenn – when it comes to hor­ror, i prefer to have the thought-provoking mes­sages embed­ded with­in a sea of vis­cer­al thrills.

  • refriedwhiskey says:

    I wish people, you know, would stop, you know, try­ing to write like, you know, Glenn.