Asides

The current cinema, because of the wonderful things it does edition

By March 6, 2013No Comments

Oz

Sometimes I won­der wheth­er the thing I’ll most be remembered for as a crit­ic will be hav­ing gone easy on proclaimed-to-be-foredoomed-by-mainstream-media Disney block­busters. Yeah, I see that Oz The Great And Powerful Oz has been get­ting over­all bet­ter reviews than John Carter (which you may recall, and this is cent­ral to my point, I rather liked), but still, you get my gist. I’m mixed on Oz—James Franco’s cast­ing is very nearly dis­astrous, for one thing—but I do insist that by the end it gets its job done. Your mileage may vary, of course, and this of course depends very much the extent to which you’re inves­ted in the job the movie pro­poses to do.  Reviewed for MSN Movies

Also reviewed: Christian Mingiu’s entirely admirable…perhaps TOO admir­able…Beyond The Hills

No Comments

  • BrianZ says:

    I’m pretty much with you on this one entirely, though I found more of Franco’s per­form­ance enjoy­able, if still a tad too loose at times. Raimi really con­jured a couple big wow moments for me though that lingered, which isn’t com­mon in these effects spec­tacles. The tor­ando scene, the Wicked one’s arrival through the portal and Oz’s final plan all standout.

  • Josh Z says:

    So, his name is Oz, and the land is also called Oz? Does any­one at least com­ment on that?
    And how do they ret-con the fact that this is a pre­quel to a story that was all a young girl’s dream, which takes place before that girl was even born? Is this one Auntie M’s dream?

  • Tom Russell says:

    Josh: I’ve always been of the mind that any time an entire film is sup­posed to have been a dream– be it WIZARD OF OZ, DR. T AND THE WOMEN, what-have-you– that it all really happened. More magic that way.

  • Tom Russell says:

    … And that should be THE 5000 FINGERS OF DR. T, obvi­ously. Oy.

  • Joel Gordon says:

    I don’t know, Tom. Doesn’t a tor­nado carry Richard Gere away at the end of Dr. T, and then he deliv­ers a baby in the middle of the desert of some­thing? I may be remem­ber­ing it wrong.

  • Lex says:

    What the hell kind of man has ever seen THE WIZARD OF OZ in the last 30 years? CHRIST.
    Saw that shit once in 1980 or 1981 on TV, my mom put­ting it on telling me it was a clas­sic, me all think­ing it was kind of old and shit.… Then my dad came home drunk as fuck and put on his best imit­a­tion of Frederic Forrest in FALLING DOWN impres­sion, all wound up “WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT?” And Ma hur­riedly turn­ing it up but not in time, cuz you best mother­fuck­ing believe a shoe was fly­ing across the room and the next day I went WAY the fuck out of my way to break out my pack of FLEER CARDS so the old man knew I still liked pussy.
    Also does Kunis show her feet?

  • Jeff McMahon says:

    ^^^ Just gross and not funny.

  • What the hell kind of man has ever seen THE WIZARD OF OZ in the last 30 years?”
    MY but you’e proud not to be gay, Lex.
    A tragedy in my book.

  • Grant L says:

    Have not looked into it (barely knew it exis­ted until now, which only shows that my taste for pre-publicity has died way down) but are Raimi & Co. say­ing it’s a pre­quel to the movie, or to the books? Because in the books Oz isn’t Dorothy’s dream, it’s an actu­al place.
    Adore the Wizard of Oz. And I use the word ‘adore’ delib­er­ately. One of the won­der­ful things about not being a Real Man and hav­ing no interest in being one is being one’s whole self, not just a tiny slice with a check­list of attrib­utes that you’re not allowed to stray from.

  • Grant L says:

    I think it’s great – so many arti­fi­cial walls fall­ing. Here’s a pretty smart girl singing a song about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg4YdXUaCg0

  • Not David Bordwell says:

    Gotta add, for fans of her work it ain’t too hard to dis­cern whose body is under­neath that green in the ban­ner ads splashed all over the MSN site, and I don’t think her ini­tials start with M.
    …maybe.

  • Paul Duane says:

    Totally with you on this one, Glenn. I brought my five-year-old, and she enjoyed it pretty much as well as I did (though she did loudly say, about six minutes into the b/w pro­logue, “Daddy? When does it start?”). The mis­match between the A story (Will Oscar grow up and start to respect women, and him­self?) and the B story (some­thing about a proph­ecy, yada yada) is pretty wide, but the nar­rat­ive ticks along nicely enough with visu­al set­pieces aplenty to enjoy while wait­ing for the big Inglourious Wizards fin­ish. If this does­n’t make Mila Kunis a big star, noth­ing will. She’s flat-out great, as great as Franco is… absent. Raimi needs to cul­tiv­ate him­self anoth­er, young­er Bruce Campbell (whose small scene here is a tiny, very Raimi, delight).

  • Yann says:

    It’s CRISTIAN MUNGIU !
    – nice review, though, will check out that Schrader book.

  • Lex says:

    Mila Kunis has been a “big star” for about 12 years.

  • george says:

    I meant THIS is awe­some (and so is she).